|
|
Duck and Cover: It’s the New Survivalism |
|
|
|
|
Written by Bob Woods
|
|
Saturday, 05 April 2008 16:00 |
|
By ALEX WILLIAMS
NY Times Published: April 6, 2008 THE traditional face of survivalism is that of a shaggy loner in camouflage, holed up in a cabin in the wilderness and surrounded by cases of canned goods and ammunition.
It is not that of Barton M. Biggs, the former chief global strategist at Morgan Stanley. Yet in Mr. Biggs’s new book, “Wealth, War and Wisdom,” he says people should “assume the possibility of a breakdown of the civilized infrastructure.” “Your safe haven must be self-sufficient and capable of growing some kind of food,” Mr. Biggs writes. “It should be well-stocked with seed, fertilizer, canned food, wine, medicine, clothes, etc. Think Swiss Family Robinson. Even in America and Europe there could be moments of riot and rebellion when law and order temporarily completely breaks down.” Survivalism, it seems, is not just for survivalists anymore. Faced with a confluence of diverse threats — a tanking economy, a housing crisis, looming environmental disasters, and a sharp spike in oil prices — people who do not consider themselves extremists are starting to discuss doomsday measures once associated with the social fringes. They stockpile or grow food in case of a supply breakdown, or buy precious metals in case of economic collapse. Some try to take their houses off the electricity grid, or plan safe houses far away. The point is not to drop out of society, but to be prepared in case the future turns out like something out of “An Inconvenient Truth,” if not “Mad Max.” “I’m not a gun-nut, camo-wearing skinhead. I don’t even hunt or fish,” said Bill Marcom, 53, a construction executive in Dallas. Still, motivated by a belief that the credit crunch and a bursting housing bubble might spark widespread economic chaos — “the Greater Depression,” as he put it — Mr. Marcom began to take measures to prepare for the unknown over the last few years: buying old silver coins to use as currency; buying G.P.S. units, a satellite telephone and a hydroponic kit; and building a simple cabin in a remote West Texas desert. “If all these planets line up and things do get really bad,” Mr. Marcom said, “those who have not prepared will be trapped in the city with thousands of other people needing food and propane and everything else.” Interest in survivalism — in either its traditional hard-core version or a middle-class “lite” variation — functions as a leading economic indicator of social anxiety, preparedness experts said: It spikes at times of peril real (the post-Sept. 11 period) or imagined (the chaos that was supposed to follow the so-called Y2K computer bug in 2000). At times, a degree of paranoia is officially sanctioned. In the 1950s, civil defense authorities encouraged people to build personal bomb shelters because of the nuclear threat. In 2003, the Department of Homeland Security encouraged Americans to stock up on plastic sheeting and duct tape to seal windows in case of biological or chemical attacks. Now, however, the government, while still conducting business under a yellow terrorism alert, is no longer taking a lead role in encouraging preparedness. For some, this leaves a vacuum of reassurance, and plenty to worry about. Esteemed economists debate whether the credit crisis could result in a complete meltdown of the financial system. A former vice president of the United States informs us that global warming could result in mass flooding, disease and starvation, perhaps even a new Ice Age. “You just can’t help wonder if there’s a train wreck coming,” said David Anderson, 50, a database administrator in Colorado Springs who said he was moved by economic uncertainties and high energy prices, among other factors, to stockpile months’ worth of canned goods in his basement for his wife, his two young children and himself. Popular culture also provides reinforcement, in books like “The Road,” Cormac McCarthy’s novel about a father and son journeying through a post-apocalyptic wasteland, and films like “I Am Legend,” which stars Will Smith as a survivor of a man-made virus wandering the barren streets of New York. Middle-class survivalists can also browse among a growing number of how-to books with titles like “Dare to Prepare!” a self-published work by Holly Drennan Deyo, or “When All Hell Breaks Loose” by Cody Lundin (Gibbs Smith, 2007), which instructs readers how to dispose of bodies and dine on rats and dogs in the event of disaster.
Preparedness activity is difficult to track statistically, since people who take measures are usually highly circumspect by nature, said Jim Rawles, the editor of www.survivalblog.com, a preparedness Web site. Nevertheless, interest in the survivalist movement “is experiencing its largest growth since the late 1970s,” Mr. Rawles said in an e-mail, adding that traffic at his blog has more than doubled in the past 11 months, with more than 67,000 unique visitors per week. And its base is growing. “Our core readership is still solidly conservative,” he said. “But in recent months I’ve noticed an increasing number of stridently green and left-of-center readers.” One left-of-center environmentalist who is taking action is Alex Steffen, the executive editor of www.wWorldchanging.com, a Web site devoted to sustainability. With only slight irony, Mr. Steffen, 40, said he and his girlfriend could serve as “poster children for the well-adjusted, urban liberal survivalist,” given that they keep a six-week cache of food and supplies in his basement in Seattle (although they polished off their bottle of doomsday whiskey at a party). He said the chaos following Hurricane Katrina served as a wake-up call for him and others that the government might not be able to protect them in an emergency or environmental crisis. “The ‘where do we land when climate change gets crazy?’ question seems to be an increasingly common one,” said Mr. Steffen in an e-mail message, adding that such questions have “really gone mainstream.” Many of the new, nontraditional preparedness converts are “Peakniks,” Mr. Rawles said, referring to adherents of the “Peak Oil” theory. This concept holds that the world will soon, or has already, reached a peak in oil production, and that coming supply shortages might threaten society. While the theory is still disputed by many industry analysts and executives, it has inched toward the mainstream in the last two years, as oil prices have nearly doubled, surpassing $100 a barrel. The topic, which was the subject of a United States Department of Energy report in 2005, has attracted attention in publications like The New York Times Magazine and The Wall Street Journal, and was a primary focus of “Megadisasters: Oil Apocalypse,” a recent History Channel special. Another book, “The Long Emergency” (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2005), by James Howard Kunstler, an author and journalist who writes about economic and environmental issues, argues that American suburbs and cities may soon lay desolate as people, starved of oil, are forced back to the land to adopt a hardscrabble, 19th-century-style agrarian life. Such fears caused Joyce Jimerson of Bellingham, Wash., a coordinator for a recycling-composting program affiliated with Washington State University, to make her yard an “edible garden,” with fruit trees and vegetables, in case supplies are threatened by oil shortages, climate change or economic collapse. “It’s all the same ball of wax, as far as I’m concerned,” she said. Scott Troyer, an energy consultant in Sunnyvale, Calif., said he was spurred by discussions of peak oil — “it’s not a theory,” he said — and other energy concerns to remake his suburban house in anticipation of a petroleum-starved future. Mr. Troyer, 57, installed a photovoltaic electricity system, a pellet stove and a “cool roof” to reflect the sun’s rays, among other measures. Mr. Troyer remains cautiously optimistic that Americans can wean themselves from oil through smart engineering and careful planning. But, he said, “the doomsday scenarios will happen if people don’t prepare.” Some middle-class preparedness converts, like Val Vontourne, a musician and paralegal in Olympia, Wash., recoil at the term “survivalist,” even as they stock their homes with food, gasoline and water. “I think of survivalists as being an extreme case of preparedness,” said Ms. Vontourne, 44, “people who stockpile guns and weapons, anticipating extreme aggression. Whereas what I’m doing, I think of as something responsible people do. “I now think of storing extra food, water, medicine and gasoline in the same way I think of buying health insurance and putting money in my 401k,” she said. “It just makes sense.” |
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 06 April 2008 04:04 )
|
|
|
Local Currencies Take Off |
|
|
|
|
Written by Bob Woods
|
|
Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:19 |
|
Local-only currency in Portland? Think plastic Nondollars - Advocates of "buy-local" money consider debit cards instead of paper bills -- a national first Sunday, February 24, 2008 JOSEPH ROSE The Oregonian Staff The aroma of espresso and the lonesome siren of Neil Young's acoustic guitar danced in the air at Mojo's coffee shop in Southeast Portland. It was a relaxing place on a rainy winter's day, except that a round-faced man in a tweed cap kept talking about starting a revolution. Or maybe a counterfeiting ring. "We can print our own money," insisted Alan Rosenblith. "I mean, who says we need the federal government's money to buy food and pay off our debts?" Rosenblith, a 29-year-old documentary filmmaker, is among a gaggle of kitchen-table economists pushing for a local currency in Portland by year's end. It's an idealistic -- pessimists might say "utopian" -- buy-local idea with a shaky past. But this new money will be different, the group calling itself PDX Currency contends. Instead of paper bills like the ones printed by groups in Hood River, Corvallis and elsewhere, Portland would use plastic in the nation's first local currency debit card effort. "I'd like to get in on that," shouted a man with a bushy moustache working behind the counter at Mojo's. "But," he paused, wrestling for words, "wouldn't I risk going to jail?" It's typically the first question. "People get funny about money," said Susan Witt, founder of BerkShares in the Berkshire region of Massachusetts, where residents have walked into five participating local banks and exchanged $1.3 million for the local currency in the past two years. "They're under the spell of the dollar," Witt says. "Anything else feels weird." In fact, local currencies, which date to Colonial scrip, are perfectly legal, advocates say. So far, the Internal Revenue Service has never disagreed. As far as the government is concerned, local currencies are just another form of bartering, allowed under contracts law. As long, that is, as you report gains or losses on your federal taxes. The point of the currencies is to keep local money local. If enough businesses agree to accept it, the alt-money can be used for groceries, doctor's bills, clothes, garbage collection or maybe a CD at the neighborhood record shop. The problem is that the idea often falls apart when confronted with real-world market forces. Since Ithaca, N.Y., started the modern-day revival of local currency in 1991, at least 85 similar programs have popped up around the country. Only about one in five, however, lasted more than a few years, said Ed Collom, a University of Southern Maine sociologist who has studied local currencies. "The problem is that they are almost always volunteer-run social movements," Collom said. After the startup phase, he said, "leaders have a hard time finding anyone with the same passion to keep them going." Indeed, a Portland effort called Rose City Hours disappeared almost before it started in the 1990s. The group didn't grow beyond a handful of neighbors keeping track of credits on a computer spreadsheet before it collapsed. That's a common scenario, Collom said. Most alternative money lacks support from businesses, he said, which means consumers who buy into the idea have few places to spend the local scrip. For its part, River Hours in Hood River got a groovy launch in 2004. During that year's Hoodstock festival, '60s icon Wavy Gravy put a wad of the green, orange and purple bills in a shrine on the stage and blessed them under the autumn sun. "He made a speech about how we need to be more community-oriented," said Theresa North, a member of the nonprofit board that founded the currency and regulates its exchange rate with the U.S. dollar. Today, employees at the town's La Clinica health center accept part of their paychecks in River Hours. Green-goods import shop Small Planet Trading took out a $300 low-interest Hours loan to pay for its Web site. The bills even show up in church collection plates. Recently, the Hood River Downtown Business Association endorsed the currency. But growth has been slow. Just eight of the business association's 120 members have agreed to accept River Hours. At Dog River Coffee on Oak Street, a sticker declaring "River Hours Accepted Here" greets customers at the front door. Yet the shop takes in only $20 worth -- 2 River Hours -- each month, said owner Nate Devol, who allows one-tenth of an Hour (that's $1) toward any transaction. Devol said he would love to accept more but has a hard time getting rid of the ones that end up in his till. "It's a political hot potato to say," he said, "but there isn't much of a network in a community this size." Most of Dog River's vendors are out of town and aren't interested in taking River Hours for their services. So, Devol collects the bills in an envelope until he has enough to pay his newspaper vendor. "I think it could get more traction in a big city," he said, "where there's a stronger network of local vendors." In Portland, the movement started on a night last fall. About 30 people settled into metal folding chairs in the meeting room of Southeast Portland's People Food Co-op to watch Rosenblith give a PowerPoint show extolling local currency. Some instantly fell in love with the idea of Portland's own paper money. One woman asked whether the denominations could feature the city's bridges and be designed by local artists. But in the series of weekly meetings since, the idea of using the debit card technology won out. Smart move, said Stacy Mitchell, author of the book "Big Box Swindle" and a senior researcher for the Institute of Local Self-Reliance in Minneapolis. "You'd be able to do all the things you can with local currency, without having to print the money," she said. "It's something that could immediately catch on." The PDX Currency steering committee says it can overcome the usual obstacles by avoiding the onerous task of designing and distributing paper money. People will be able to get credit in exchange for both federal money and for services they provide, unlike in most systems. What's more, they say, Portland is a place where far-out ideas come to grow into the mainstream. Why not indie money? "Portland's known for its independent streak," said Charlie Stephens, a sustainable-building consultant. PDX Currency plans to soon have a strategic plan it can pitch to sustainability groups that might be willing to provide seed money for a "community credit co-op," where accounts would exist -- although Rosenblith said, "I'd hate to call it a bank." But with only months before the group would like to get the effort off the ground, it's hard to find a business owner who has heard of it -- although some express curiosity when asked. "When we started, we wanted to make sure we were involved in this sort of thing," said Duane Sorenson, owner of Stumptown Coffee Roasters, which has five shops brewing so-called free-trade coffee in Portland. Of course, if the currency group's most recent public meeting is any indication, it won't be simple to galvanize the public. After reserving a room at the Northeast Portland business center CubeSpace, Rosenblith sent out dozens of e-mail invitations. Local business owners were on the list. The room held 50 comfortably. Three showed up. Most of the chairs remained neatly pushed up to the round tables. During an hourlong presentation, Rosenblith offered his usual stump speech: "Every federal dollar we've ever owned in our life is issued through bank debt." The dollar, he said, is a brand, like Coca-Cola. "The monetary system is so unsustainable at the moment that we're either going to collapse or go back to the Dark Ages." Marian Grebarnier, a 59-year-old Southeast Portland resident, took notes and nodded as Rosenblith showed diagrams of how the system might work. Still, at the end, she shot him a puzzled look. "Even after all of that," she said, "I'm not sure I get it." Joseph Rose: 503-221-8029;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:13 )
|
|
Salmon Crisis: "Unprecedented Collapse" |
|
|
|
|
Friday, 01 February 2008 13:39 |
 Yesterday, an internal memo leaked out of the offices of the Pacific Fishery Management Council and into the hands of the press. The story outlined in that memo is horrific: The Chinook salmon of California's central valley, and indeed the salmon populations all up and down the west coast, are crashing. They are in "precipitous decline." Since the salmon crisis on our own Columbia river is being blamed upon sea lions at Bonneville dam, sea lions who are being threatened with assassination this spring due to the dwindling salmon, it is important that we look at the real scope, depth, and breadth of this problem. It is not only the salmon of the Columbia, but those of every waterway along the west coast, who are in peril. According to the Pacific Fishery Management Council memo, this year's run of fall Chinook on the Sacramento river dropped by a shocking 67 percent over last year's run. Sixty-seven percent! This number is even more astonishing if we consider that, last year, the same organization lamented the unexpectedly low numbers of returning salmon, so that a 67 percent drop in an already calamitously low number raises the looming specter of extinction. In truth, the salmon population has been taking a precipitous nose-dive for years. Over-fishing, loss of habitat, and collapsing ecosystems are to blame. On the Columbia, we have the added burden of being the only river in the nation to actually allow commercial gill nets within the river channel -- a channel that is home to fish known to be "protected" under the Endangered Species Act. (If you want to see this for yourself, you will need to go out at night. Wisely, the commercial nets are not cast until after 7pm. They work at night, when there are few witnesses. But, despite the thousands of threatened and endangered salmon swept up in the nets, the ODFW declares that their activities are perfectly legal.) The dams along the west coast, along with water shortages brought about by heavy agricultural and industrial use, have reduced salmon habitat by more than 90 percent. The 10 percent of habitat that is left to the salmon is marred by pollution, fishermen, and slack and warmer waters that the salmon are not genetically adapted to survive in. Hatchery fish have out-competed native fish, and have then died off as a result of environmental stressors that they, too, were not designed to withstand. (Indeed, the Pacific Fishery Management Council noted that both wild and hatchery salmon have returned to the rivers in startlingly low numbers.)
All of the waterways of the west are seeing the crisis. The Siletz river saw only 500 salmon return upstream this year. The salmon once surged up these rivers in the millions. Now, some rivers see no salmon at all. The Fishery Management Council's executive director, Donald McIsaac, referred to the salmon crisis as an "unprecedented collapse."
Clearly, the salmon are in peril. Researchers all over the world are finding similar patterns. Over-fishing, pollution, and habitat destruction by humans is causing all of the world's fish populations to plummet. Some researchers suggest that large fish populations in the oceans have already dropped by as much as 90 percent since the 1950s. (See, for example, http://news.mongabay.com/2005/0504-rhett_butler.html, though I disagree with their "tragedy of the commons" explanation.) These are truly terrifying numbers. Such an indication of destruction of the fabric of life on this planet should give us pause to think. The salmon may be the canaries in the coal mine, if you will forgive the over-used metaphor.
Here in Cascadia, as noted previously on this site, officials are attempting to scapegoat sea lions for the decline in the salmon populations. Apparently, these officials are unaware of the true scope of the crisis. Their "solution" to a world-wide plunge in fish populations is to kill sea lions in the Columbia, beginning as early as next month. We need to question their assumptions here. If the salmon crisis is as widespread and as perilous as the numbers would seem to indicate, then clearly it cannot be a result of sea lion predation. (Because, as noted many times on this site, sea lions have always come up the Columbia with the salmon. Yet the decimation of the salmon population is a very recent phenomenon, and is far more widespread than this little corner of Cascadia.)
Often, when officials have attempted to "manage" wildlife populations like this, their efforts have led to drastic and unforeseen consequences, resulting in peril for the surrounding ecosystem. One of the places in which this can be seen most clearly is in misguided attempts to "manage" predator species, in order to protect humans or their coveted resources. (See, for example, some of the many studies uncovering the damage wrought by clueless wildlife management policies aimed at eradicating coyotes, wolves, bears, predatory cats, and others.)
James A Lichatowich, a fisheries scientist specializing in Northwest salmon populations, as well as author of "Salmon Without Rivers" says in the introduction to his book, "Fundamentally, the salmon's decline has been the consequence of a vision based on flawed assumptions and unchallenged myths.... We assumed we could control the biological productivity of salmon and 'improve' upon natural processes that we didn't even try to understand." Before we embark upon any more of those flawed assumptions and unchallenged myths, we need to understand what is really causing the salmon crisis. We need to beware of false solutions targeting natural predator species that co-evolved along-side the salmon. Proposals that target predator species fail to recognize or address the real problems, and instead waste valuable time, resources, and lives. Frequently, such efforts leave the entire ecosystem more frayed, more damaged, and more unbalanced than ever.
It might be instructive to note that some people in California are trying to blame orcas, killer whales, for the reduction in the California salmon population. Apparently, a pod of orcas has been frequenting the area off Monterey Bay for the past few years. Prior to this, killer whales were almost never sighted so far south. They do not usually venture south of the mouth of the Columbia river. The whales are assumed to be feeding on salmon. Researchers surmise that the orcas are venturing far out of their range because they are unable to find adequate fish to feed themselves up north, in their traditional territories. So it would appear that they are showing up near Monterey as a result of the salmon crisis. They did not cause the crisis, any more than the sea lions of the Columbia are causing it. They are simply trying to adapt to the catastrophe. It is foolish to blame the orcas or the sea lions for this crisis, and it would be unforgivably foolish to kill these species in a misguided attempt to "save" the salmon.
Indeed, any effort to do so would be more likely to make the crisis even worse: One factor in the spiraling fish populations, according to many researchers, has to do with fractured links in the ecosystem which have far-reaching and unexpected effects that ripple through the rest of the system. Often, crises such as this one are brought about by the removal of predator species from the food chain. (See, for example, studies showing that the disappearance of wolves from the west resulted in a destruction and displacement of species all the way down to tree saplings. Or see studies linking the removal of coyotes with unexpected explosions in exotic rodent populations.)
It should be clear to anyone paying attention to this issue that the salmon are in crisis, that something must be done to save them, and that killing sea lions is not the answer. Every last commercial net must be pulled from the waters. Dams must be breached. And our voracious appetites for every last drop of blood that the planet has to give must be curbed. |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 05 February 2008 21:37 )
|
|
|
Written by Bob Woods
|
|
Friday, 25 January 2008 03:32 |
Just a reminder: Something positive you can do now to build an essential tribal community.
If you live in Cascadia along any of the these Ten Rivers (Siletz, Yaquina, Alsea, Luckiamute, Mary's, Long Tom, Willamette, Calapooia, and the North and South Santiam), you are invited to a strategic meeting to plan for food security in our region.
You are invited to attend the next meeting of the Ten Rivers Food Web. The Ten Rivers Food Web was created to Provide strategic leadership to build an economically and environmentally sustainable local food system in Benton, Linn and Lincoln Counties (others are invited also include (Multnomah, Marion and Polk Counties - all along the Willamette River).
Our foodshed follows several water sheds: Naming the Ten Rivers — Siletz, Yaquina, Alsea, Luckiamute, Mary's, Long Tom, Willamette, Calapooia, and the North and South Santiam — draws the mind through what is, in essence, our local food shed. This coast-to-Cascades area offers the potential for a rich, varied and healthful diet for all citizens, if we focus on using our resources wisely.
Web site is located at http://www.tenriversfoodweb.org/
The Ten Rivers Food web is currently organized in Linn, Benton and Lincoln Counties. People from Polk and Marion County are invited to attend the next meeting.
The Neighborhood Initiatives Committee invites you a planning meeting on Sunday, January 27th 2:00 p.m. First Congregational Church Meeting Hall 4515 SW West Hills Road Corvallis
Topics of discussion: - How can local food be made more readily available in your neighborhood?
- What will a food assessment help us accomplish? - Is it time to begin a "TRFW-participant" campaign? - Can we build some contracts with local food farmers? - How could neighborhood food be shared more widely? - What other ideas would you like to share?
If you would like to attend please RSVP going to their website and sending them a message: http://www.tenriversfoodweb.org/ |
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 03 February 2008 11:54 )
|
|
Cascadia Society PDX meeting |
|
|
|
|
Written by Kumtux17
|
|
Friday, 28 December 2007 19:48 |
|
NEXT GENERAL MEETING: May 27th, 2008-- 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM at Madison's Grill 1109 SE 11th Ave, Portland, OR 97214. On May 2nd, 2008, Cascadia Commons hosted its declaration line crossing event at Champoeg State Park to commemorate our declaration and the beginning of forming a non-profit corporation. We have been working towards creating a friendly-society that will establish community groups interested in supporting local economy, local agriculture, bioregional re-inhabitation, and the preservation of local culture and history. Cascadia Commons will be an advocacy and philanthropic group that will provide assistance and financial investments encouraging members to re-inhabit their watersheds, become self-reliant, and make our communities sustainable. Additionally, the organization will be a social group for members to gather for some respite, a BBQ, and to raise a pint. For the May 27th meeting, we will be discussing and editing the rough draft of the Cascadia Commons constitution, and in particular, we will discuss the powers of the organization. Additionally, we will be discussing topics related to the following links: - http://www.nrp.org. City of Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Project is an alternative means to improve urban neighborhoods other than the traditional top-down, poverty decentralizing system used by most municipal planning agencies. The Minneapolis NRP is the inspirational model for Cascadia Commons.
- http://www.allianceonline.org/ The Alliance for Nonprofit Management is a professional association devoted to improving the management and governance capacity of nonprofits, and is another inspirational model for Cascadia Commons.
- http://www.friendlysocieties.co.uk/ Friendly societies were once a popular form of local government that predates the welfare/nation-state. There are still a few friendly societies in existence in the UK and Friendly Societies.uk is a reference guide to friendly societies in the United Kingdom. The friendly society model is also another inspiration model to Cascadia Commons.
- http://www.bioregional-congress.org/. Another goal of Cascadia Commons is to be the Cascadian representative for the Bioregional Congress. The Congress convened in Cascadia/British Columbia in 1988. Currently, the congress does not have a location for the 10th annual congress... stay tuned.
- http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_society. A society where a combination of social and media networks shape its prime mode of organization.
- http://www.pdxcurrency.com/. PDX currency is operating as a "Community Credit Formation Committee." It also serves as the current website for the Cascadia Trading Cooperative.
- http://www.gmlets.u-net.com/. Homepage for the LETS system, an exchange system that keeps resources local, used only by locals, and keeps resources in sufficient supply.
- http://www.openmoney.org/ Open money is a means of exchange freely available to all.
Cascadia Commons is actively working towards creating policies that will not only support our objectives, but also create a network of nonprofit institutions that will make Cascadia a better place to live. Working outward from our own lifestyles, to the neighborhoods, cities, watersheds, ecoregions and the bioregion, we hope to put our actions in line with our most fervently held beliefs, and doing positive, uplifting things to help make the world better, as that’s the most effective way to take responsibility for each of our own lives. We love where we live, and we gather to maintain Cascadia as one of the greatest places on Earth. Kloshe nanitch, Cascadia Commons - PDX chapter |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 13 May 2008 19:36 )
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
|
|